Art is not what you see, but what you make others see.- Edgar Degas

↓

Hello Hello 👋

Last week, I was having chat with one of the great landscape photographers here in the UK. The entire discussion around OpenAI & GenerativeAI; how it will change the way we do or see things today. Here is my today’s view on landscape photography.

Have you ever seen a landscape photo or art that left you speechless? That’s the beauty of human-captured photographs. It is the art of capturing beautiful, natural landscapes, and the emotions they evoke, through a camera lens. While technology has advanced tremendously in recent years, including the rise of AI-generated landscapes, there still needs to be a fundamental difference between human and machine-generated landscape photography.

⛵I believe that AI-generated landscape photography will never be able to replace humans in terms of photography or art. Yes, AI may be able to analyze and replicate patterns and colors, but it lacks the ability to capture moments in a way that’s uniquely human.

Again, AI-generated landscape photos may look impressive, but they lack the artistry and creativity that comes with humans. Every photographer has their own unique style and way of seeing the world. This difference in perspective makes human capture so unique and meaningful.

Every photographer has their own individual style, and it’s this difference in perspective and connection with nature and landscape that gives their work a personal touch. Also, every photograph has a story to tell or memories to remember.

🤔 What do you think? Do you agree that AI will never be able to replace real photographers? Or do you think that technology may eventually surpass human creativity in this field?

One reason I think that AI will never be able to replace human photographers is the unpredictable nature of landscapes. The beauty of nature lies in its randomness and unpredictability, and it’s this very element that makes landscape photography challenging and rewarding.

A photographer is able to adapt to these changes and capture the essence of a moment in a way that AI never can. And That’s how every photograph is different, even though taken on the same scene by various photographers.

🚀 In fact, a study by Oxford University found that only 35% of photography jobs are at risk of being automated. This is because photography is more than just a technical skill – it requires creativity, adaptability, and a deep understanding of the subject. The same goes for portrait photography Photographers work closely with models and understand in a better way to make the best craft.

So what’s your opinion? Do you think that AI-generated landscape photography will eventually surpass human capture, or do you agree that there’s a certain magic that only human photographers can bring to their work?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.

Until the next email, let’s be mindful of our environment 🟢. Cheers!!

📆 product update

In this section, I share any cool new product or feature released in past few weeks

• Adobe Lightroom (20-Apr update – Adobe released AI-powered Denoise to reduce noise from your images even with higher ISO
• AI software for which I referred above DALL-E 2 by OpenAI, &Midjourney​

📚popular posts

• ​9 Best Camera Settings to Master Landscape Photography​
• ​Golden Week Itineraries for the Ultimate Japan Experience (6 Free Itinerary to download)
• ​Adobe Lightroom vs Photoshop which one is better for photographer​

🍾 photo of the week

​Click here to see my favourite photo this week